Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 1,311 of 1,311 total issues

Method net_http_object has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def net_http_object(hostname, port)
      p_uri = proxy_uri

      if p_uri.nil?
        # no proxy set
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/patches/rest_client_patch.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method process_sub_xml has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.process_sub_xml(xmlNode, path, options = {})
    results = []
    xmlNode.each_element do |e|
      if e.name == 'dir'
        results += process_sub_xml(e, path + '\\' + e.attributes['name'], options)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/filesystem.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method determine_visibility has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def determine_visibility(platform, supports_customization_template, customize_fields_list)
    field_names_to_edit = []
    field_names_to_hide = []

    if supports_customization_template
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/services/customize_fields_visibility_service.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.validate_storage_queue(userid, ext_management_system, options = {})
    options["password"] = ManageIQ::Password.encrypt(options["password"])

    task_opts = {
      :action => "validating PhysicalStorage for user #{userid}",
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/physical_storage.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/physical_storage.rb on lines 101..118

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method validate_params! has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def validate_params!(env_vars, extra_vars, tags, ansible_runner_method, playbook_or_role_args)
        errors = []

        errors << "env_vars must be a Hash, got: #{hash.class}" unless env_vars.kind_of?(Hash)
        errors << "extra_vars must be a Hash, got: #{hash.class}" unless extra_vars.kind_of?(Hash)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ansible/runner.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        begin
          report.update!(attrs)
        rescue ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid
          duplicate = find_by(:name => name)
          if duplicate&.rpt_type == "Custom"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_report/seeding.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/scan_item/seeding.rb on lines 91..102

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  COMMON_ATTRIBUTES = [
    {
      :component  => 'text-field',
      :label      => N_('Username'),
      :helperText => N_('Username for this credential'),
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/network_credential.rb and 3 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/amazon_credential.rb on lines 2..22
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/openstack_credential.rb on lines 2..22
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/vmware_credential.rb on lines 2..22

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  COMMON_ATTRIBUTES = [
    {
      :component  => 'text-field',
      :label      => N_('Username'),
      :helperText => N_('Username for this credential'),
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/vmware_credential.rb and 3 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/amazon_credential.rb on lines 2..22
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/network_credential.rb on lines 2..22
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/openstack_credential.rb on lines 2..22

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  COMMON_ATTRIBUTES = [
    {
      :component  => 'text-field',
      :label      => N_('Access Key'),
      :helperText => N_('AWS Access Key for this credential'),
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/amazon_credential.rb and 3 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/network_credential.rb on lines 2..22
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/openstack_credential.rb on lines 2..22
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/vmware_credential.rb on lines 2..22

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method offers has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def offers(perf, ts, options, type, target)
      return nil if options.nil?

      options[:mode] ||= COMPUTE_OFFERS_MODE_DEFAULT[type]
      options[:metric] ||= COMPUTE_OFFERS_METRIC_DEFAULT[type]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vim_performance_analysis.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method set_ws_field_value_by_display_name has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_ws_field_value_by_display_name(values, key, data, dialog_name, dlg_fields, obj_key = :name)
    value = data.delete(key)

    dlg_field = dlg_fields[key]
    data_type = dlg_field[:data_type]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method operands2rubyvalue has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.operands2rubyvalue(operator, ops, context_type)
    if ops["field"]
      if ops["field"] == "<count>"
        ["<count>", quote(ops["value"], :integer)]
      else
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/miq_expression.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.create_physical_storage_queue(userid, ext_management_system, options = {})
    options["password"] = ManageIQ::Password.encrypt(options["password"])

    task_opts = {
      :action => "creating PhysicalStorage for user #{userid}",
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/physical_storage.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/physical_storage.rb on lines 83..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method target_name has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def target_name
          e_text = if @event.target_name # Create the title using Policy description
                     @event.target_name
                   elsif @event.miq_policy_id && MiqPolicy.exists?(@event.miq_policy_id) # or Policy name
                     MiqPolicy.find(@event.miq_policy_id).name
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/reporting/formatter/timeline_message.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        begin
          scan_item.update!(attrs)
        rescue ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid
          duplicate = find_by(:name => name)
          if duplicate&.prod_default == "Custom"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/scan_item/seeding.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/miq_report/seeding.rb on lines 71..82

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method has too many optional parameters. [9/3]
Open

  def raw_clone(_name, _folder, _pool = nil, _host = nil, _datastore = nil, _powerOn = false, _template_flag = false, _transform = nil, _config = nil, _customization = nil, _disk = nil)
    raise NotImplementedError, _("must be implemented in a subclass")
  end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_or_template/operations.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [11/5]
Open

  def raw_clone(_name, _folder, _pool = nil, _host = nil, _datastore = nil, _powerOn = false, _template_flag = false, _transform = nil, _config = nil, _customization = nil, _disk = nil)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_or_template/operations.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [11/5]
Open

  def clone(name, folder, pool = nil, host = nil, datastore = nil, powerOn = false, template_flag = false, transform = nil, config = nil, customization = nil, disk = nil)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_or_template/operations.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Method has too many optional parameters. [9/3]
Open

  def clone(name, folder, pool = nil, host = nil, datastore = nil, powerOn = false, template_flag = false, transform = nil, config = nil, customization = nil, disk = nil)
    raise _("VM has no EMS, unable to clone") unless ext_management_system

    raw_clone(name, folder, pool, host, datastore, powerOn, template_flag, transform, config, customization, disk)
  end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_or_template/operations.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [11/5]
Open

      def run_role_queue(env_vars, extra_vars, role_name, user_id, queue_opts, roles_path:, role_skip_facts: true, hosts: ["localhost"], credentials: [], verbosity: 0, become_enabled: false)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ansible/runner.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end
Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language