Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 1,311 of 1,311 total issues

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [11/5]
Open

  def initialize(
    auto_placement_visibility_service = AutoPlacementVisibilityService.new,
    number_of_vms_visibility_service = NumberOfVmsVisibilityService.new,
    service_template_fields_visibility_service = ServiceTemplateFieldsVisibilityService.new,
    network_visibility_service = NetworkVisibilityService.new,
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/services/dialog_field_visibility_service.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

opts = Optimist.options do
  opt :ip,     "IP address", :type => :string, :required => true
  opt :user,   "User Name",  :type => :string, :required => true
  opt :pass,   "Password",   :type => :string, :required => true
Severity: Minor
Found in tools/vim_collect_perf_history.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
tools/vim_collect_inventory.rb on lines 6..13

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 41.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

opts = Optimist.options do
  opt :ip,     "IP address", :type => :string, :required => true
  opt :user,   "User Name",  :type => :string, :required => true
  opt :pass,   "Password",   :type => :string, :required => true
Severity: Minor
Found in tools/vim_collect_inventory.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
tools/vim_collect_perf_history.rb on lines 6..13

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 41.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def load_balancer_pool_member_pools
          add_properties(
            :manager_ref                  => %i[load_balancer_pool load_balancer_pool_member],
            :parent_inventory_collections => %i[load_balancers]
          )
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/inventory/persister/builder/network_manager.rb and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/inventory/persister/builder/network_manager.rb on lines 164..175
app/models/manageiq/providers/inventory/persister/builder/network_manager.rb on lines 199..210

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 41.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def load_balancer_listener_pools
          add_properties(
            :manager_ref                  => %i[load_balancer_listener load_balancer_pool],
            :parent_inventory_collections => %i[load_balancers]
          )
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/inventory/persister/builder/network_manager.rb and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/inventory/persister/builder/network_manager.rb on lines 128..139
app/models/manageiq/providers/inventory/persister/builder/network_manager.rb on lines 199..210

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 41.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def load_balancer_health_check_members
          add_properties(
            :manager_ref                  => %i[load_balancer_health_check load_balancer_pool_member],
            :parent_inventory_collections => %i[load_balancers]
          )
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/inventory/persister/builder/network_manager.rb and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/inventory/persister/builder/network_manager.rb on lines 128..139
app/models/manageiq/providers/inventory/persister/builder/network_manager.rb on lines 164..175

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 41.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.evacuate_queue(userid, vm, options = {})
    task_opts = {
      :action => "evacuating Instance for user #{userid}",
      :userid => userid
    }
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/cloud_manager/vm.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/cloud_manager/vm.rb on lines 264..280

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 41.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.live_migrate_queue(userid, vm, options = {})
    task_opts = {
      :action => "migrating Instance for user #{userid}",
      :userid => userid
    }
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/cloud_manager/vm.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/cloud_manager/vm.rb on lines 287..303

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 41.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method set_role_activation has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_role_activation(active, *roles)
    roles = roles.first if roles.length == 1 && roles[0].kind_of?(Array)
    return if roles.empty?

    ids = roles == ["*"] ? server_roles.pluck(:id) : ServerRole.where(:name => roles).pluck(:id)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_server/role_management.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method post_historical_logs has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def post_historical_logs(taskid, log_depot)
    task = MiqTask.find(taskid)
    log_prefix = "Task: [#{task.id}]"
    log_type = "Archive"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_server/log_management.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method resolve_profiles has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def resolve_profiles(list, event = nil)
    result = []
    list.each do |pid|
      prof = MiqPolicySet.find(pid)
      next unless prof
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/mixins/miq_policy_mixin.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method wait_for_started_workers has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def wait_for_started_workers
    last_which                    = nil
    entered_wait_for_started_loop = Time.now.utc
    wait_for_started_timeout      = @worker_monitor_settings[:wait_for_started_timeout] || 10.minutes
    loop do
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_server/worker_management/monitor/start.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retire_now has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def retire_now(requester = nil)
    if retired
      return if retired_validated?

      _log.info("#{retirement_object_title}: [id:<#{id}>, name:<#{name}>], Retires On: [#{retires_on.strftime("%x %R %Z")}], was previously retired, but currently #{retired_invalid_reason}")
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/mixins/retirement_mixin.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_add_missing_timestamps has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def build_add_missing_timestamps(recs)
    return recs unless !recs.empty? && (recs.first.kind_of?(Metric) || recs.first.kind_of?(MetricRollup))
    return recs if db_options && db_options[:calc_avgs_by] && db_options[:calc_avgs_by] != "time_interval" # Only fill in missing timestamps if averages are requested to be based on time

    base_cols = Metric::BASE_COLS - ["id"]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_report/generator.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method add_elements has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.add_elements(vm, xmlNode)
    el = xmlNode.root
    return nil unless MiqXml.isXmlElement?(el)
    return nil unless el.name == 'scan_profiles'
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/scan_item.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method unsupported_reason has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def unsupported_reason(feature, instance: self)
      # undeclared features are not supported
      value = supports_features[feature.to_sym]
      if value.respond_to?(:call)
        begin
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/mixins/supports_feature_mixin.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method fetch_worker_settings_from_options_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.fetch_worker_settings_from_options_hash(options_hash, raw = false)
    return {} unless options_hash.key?(:workers)

    settings = {}
    # Get the configuration values
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_worker.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_connection_settings has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.validate_connection_settings(host, port, username, password, database = nil, adapter = nil)
    database, adapter = prepare_default_fields(database, adapter)

    log_details = "Host: [#{host}]}, Database: [#{database}], Adapter: [#{adapter}], User: [#{username}]"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_region_remote.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method apply has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def apply
    @verified_data.each do |id, data|
      obj = @klass.find_by(:id => id)
      if obj
        attrs = obj.miq_custom_attributes
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/asset_tag_import.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method child_folder_paths_recursive has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.child_folder_paths_recursive(subtree, options = {})
    options[:prefix] ||= ""
    subtree.each_with_object({}) do |(f, children), h|
      path = options[:prefix]
      unless options[:exclude_non_display_folders] && f.hidden?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/ems_folder.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language