Showing 68 of 96 total issues
Method App.RevertNote
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (app *App) RevertNote(noteID string, permanent bool) error {
noteTemplate, err := app.GetNoteByID(noteID)
if err != nil {
// to revert an applied note even if the corresponding
Method App.TuneSolution
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (app *App) TuneSolution(solName string) (removedExplicitNotes []string, err error) {
removedExplicitNotes = make([]string, 0)
sol, err := app.GetSolutionByName(solName)
if err != nil {
return
Method App.VerifyNote
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (app *App) VerifyNote(noteID string) (conforming bool, comparisons map[string]note.FieldComparison, valApplyList []string, err error) {
theNote, err := app.GetNoteByID(noteID)
if err != nil {
return
}
Function GetSolutionDefintion
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func GetSolutionDefintion(solsDir, extraDir, noteDir string) map[string]map[string]Solution {
sols := make(map[string]map[string]Solution)
sol := make(map[string]Solution)
currentArch := ""
arch := ""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function main
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def main():
# Check if FORCE is set.
try:
if os.environ['FORCE'] != '1':
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method INISettings.Optimise
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (vend INISettings) Optimise() (Note, error) {
blckOK := make(map[string][]string)
scheds := ""
next := false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getInfoTxt
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getInfoTxt(action string, state bool) (string, string, bool, bool) {
sinfo := ""
active, err := system.SystemctlIsRunning(SaptuneService)
if err != nil {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function chkBlkTags
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func chkBlkTags(info, tagField string, secFields, actbdev []string) (bool, []string) {
ret := false
info = strings.TrimPrefix(info, "blk")
tagExpr := fmt.Sprintf(".*%s.*", tagField)
// vendor or model
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"