Showing 109 of 109 total issues
Function calculateMinimalIpRange
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func calculateMinimalIpRange(ips []string) []string {
if opt.Store.Ipv6Cluster == true {
return calculateMinimalIpv6Range(ips)
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function HandleMeshedByAutoService
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func HandleMeshedByAutoService(svc *coreV1.Service, deployment *appV1.Deployment, pod *coreV1.Pod) error {
// shadow pods, shadow deployments, shadow services
if deployment != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("service '%s' is meshed but selecting more than a router pod, cannot auto recover", svc.Name)
} else if pod == nil {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AutoMesh
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func AutoMesh(svc *coreV1.Service) error {
// Lock service to avoid conflict, must be first step
svc, err := general.LockService(svc.Name, opt.Get().Global.Namespace, 0)
if err != nil {
return err
Function TidyClusterResources
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TidyClusterResources(r *ResourceToClean) {
log.Info().Msgf("Deleting %d unavailing kt pods", len(r.PodsToDelete))
for _, name := range r.PodsToDelete {
err := cluster.Ins().RemovePod(name, opt.Get().Global.Namespace)
if err != nil {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function SetOptions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func SetOptions(cmd *cobra.Command, flags *flag.FlagSet, optionStore any, config []OptionConfig) {
cmd.Long = cmd.Short
cmd.Flags().SortFlags = false
cmd.InheritedFlags().SortFlags = false
flags.SortFlags = false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Kubernetes.tryGetExistingShadows
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (k *Kubernetes) tryGetExistingShadows(resourceMeta *ResourceMeta, sshKeyMeta *SSHkeyMeta) (*coreV1.Pod, *util.SSHGenerator, error) {
var app *appV1.Deployment
var pod *coreV1.Pod
if opt.Get().Global.UseShadowDeployment {
app2, err := k.GetDeployment(resourceMeta.Name, resourceMeta.Namespace)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Kubernetes.ClusterCidr
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (k *Kubernetes) ClusterCidr(namespace string) ([]string, []string) {
ips := getServiceIps(k.Clientset, namespace)
log.Debug().Msgf("Found %d IPs", len(ips))
svcCidr := calculateMinimalIpRange(ips)
log.Debug().Msgf("Service ips are: %v", ips)
Function TidyClusterResources
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TidyClusterResources(r *ResourceToClean) {
log.Info().Msgf("Deleting %d unavailing kt pods", len(r.PodsToDelete))
for _, name := range r.PodsToDelete {
err := cluster.Ins().RemovePod(name, opt.Get().Global.Namespace)
if err != nil {
Method Cli.SetRoute
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *Cli) SetRoute(ipRange []string, excludeIpRange []string) error {
var lastErr error
anyRouteOk := false
// add by lichp, set ipv6 address
Function combineKubeOpts
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func combineKubeOpts() (err error) {
var config *clientcmdapi.Config
if opt.Get().Global.Kubeconfig != ""{
// if kubeconfig specified, always read from it
_ = os.Setenv(util.EnvKubeConfig, opt.Get().Global.Kubeconfig)
Function getPodNameAndPort
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getPodNameAndPort(serviceName string, remotePort int, namespace string) (string, int, int, error) {
svc, err := cluster.Ins().GetService(serviceName, namespace)
if err != nil {
if k8sErrors.IsNotFound(err) {
return "", 0, 0, fmt.Errorf("service '%s' is not found in namespace %s", serviceName, namespace)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getDnsAddresses
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getDnsAddresses(dnsOrder []string, upstreamDns string, clusterDnsPort int) []string {
upstreamPattern := fmt.Sprintf("^([cdptu]{3}:)?%s(:[0-9]+)?$", util.DnsOrderUpstream)
var dnsAddresses []string
for _, dnsAddr := range dnsOrder {
if dnsAddr == util.DnsOrderCluster {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (k *Kubernetes) WatchPod(name, namespace string, fAdd, fDel, fMod func(*coreV1.Pod)) {
k.watchResource(name, namespace, string(coreV1.ResourcePods), &coreV1.Pod{},
func(obj any) {
handlePodEvent(obj, "added", fAdd)
},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 149.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (k *Kubernetes) WatchService(name, namespace string, fAdd, fDel, fMod func(*coreV1.Service)) {
k.watchResource(name, namespace, string(coreV1.ResourceServices), &coreV1.Service{},
func(obj any) {
handleServiceEvent(obj, "added", fAdd)
},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 149.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function Recover
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func Recover(serviceName string) error {
svc, err := cluster.Ins().GetService(serviceName, opt.Get().Global.Namespace)
if err != nil {
log.Error().Err(err).Msgf("Failed to fetch service '%s'", serviceName)
}
Function dropHosts
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func dropHosts(rawLines []string, namespaceToDrop string) ([]string, []string, error) {
escapeBegin := -1
escapeEnd := -1
midDomain := fmt.Sprintf(".%s", namespaceToDrop)
fullDomain := fmt.Sprintf(".%s.svc.%s", namespaceToDrop, opt.Get().Connect.ClusterDomain)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Kubernetes.tryGetExistingShadows
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (k *Kubernetes) tryGetExistingShadows(resourceMeta *ResourceMeta, sshKeyMeta *SSHkeyMeta) (*coreV1.Pod, *util.SSHGenerator, error) {
var app *appV1.Deployment
var pod *coreV1.Pod
if opt.Get().Global.UseShadowDeployment {
app2, err := k.GetDeployment(resourceMeta.Name, resourceMeta.Namespace)
Function UpdateServiceSelector
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func UpdateServiceSelector(svcName, namespace string, selector map[string]string) error {
svc, err := cluster.Ins().GetService(svcName, namespace)
if err != nil {
return err
}
Function combineKubeOpts
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func combineKubeOpts() (err error) {
var config *clientcmdapi.Config
if opt.Get().Global.Kubeconfig != ""{
// if kubeconfig specified, always read from it
_ = os.Setenv(util.EnvKubeConfig, opt.Get().Global.Kubeconfig)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Recover
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func Recover(serviceName string) error {
svc, err := cluster.Ins().GetService(serviceName, opt.Get().Global.Namespace)
if err != nil {
log.Error().Err(err).Msgf("Failed to fetch service '%s'", serviceName)
}