Showing 39 of 39 total issues
Function getOptions
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function getOptions( callOptions, cwd ) {
const mrgitJsonPath = path.resolve( cwd, 'mrgit.json' );
// Default options.
let options = {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return execCommand.execute( getExecData( mergeCommand ) )
.then( execResponse => {
log.concat( execResponse.logs );
log.info( `Removing "${ branch }" branch from the local registry.` );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 67.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function createForkPool
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function createForkPool( childPath ) {
const forkPoolFactory = {
create() {
return new Promise( resolve => {
resolve( childProcess.fork( childPath ) );
Function afterExecute
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
afterExecute( parsedPackages, commandResponses, toolOptions ) {
console.log( chalk.cyan( `${ parsedPackages.size } packages have been processed.` ) );
const repositoryResolver = require( toolOptions.resolverPath );
Function log
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function log() {
const logs = new Map( [
[ 'info', [] ],
[ 'error', [] ]
] );
Function execute
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async execute( data ) {
const execCommand = require( './exec' );
let latestTag = null;
let currentTag = null;
Function execute
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
execute( data ) {
const log = require( '../utils/log' )();
const execCommand = require( './exec' );
let promise;
Function afterExecute
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
afterExecute( processedPackages, commandResponses, toolOptions ) {
const cwd = require( '../utils/getcwd' )();
const mrgitJsonPath = path.join( cwd, 'mrgit.json' );
const tagPattern = /@([^ ~^:?*\\]*?)$/;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
shell( data.arguments[ 0 ] )
.then( stdout => {
process.chdir( data.toolOptions.cwd );
log.info( stdout );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function displayLog
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function displayLog( packageName, logs, options ) {
const infoLogs = logs.info.filter( l => l.length ).join( '\n' ).trim();
const errorLogs = logs.error.filter( l => l.length ).join( '\n' ).trim();
const progressPercentage = Math.round( ( options.current / options.all ) * 100 );
Function execute
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
execute( data ) {
const log = require( '../utils/log' )();
const execCommand = require( './exec' );
return execCommand.execute( getExecData( 'git status --branch --porcelain' ) )
Function execute
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
execute( data ) {
const log = require( '../utils/log' )();
const execCommand = require( './exec' );
if ( !data.isRootRepository ) {
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( toolOptions.message ) {
message = toolOptions.message;
} else if ( cliOptions.message ) {
message = cliOptions.message;
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( toolOptions.message ) {
message = toolOptions.message;
} else if ( cliOptions.message ) {
message = cliOptions.message;
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( status.staged.length ) {
statusColumn.push( chalk.green( `+${ status.staged.length }` ) );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( status.untracked.length ) {
statusColumn.push( chalk.blue( `?${ status.untracked.length }` ) );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function getOptions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function getOptions( callOptions, cwd ) {
const mrgitJsonPath = path.resolve( cwd, 'mrgit.json' );
// Default options.
let options = {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function afterExecute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
afterExecute( processedPackages, commandResponses, toolOptions ) {
const cwd = require( '../utils/getcwd' )();
const mrgitJsonPath = path.join( cwd, 'mrgit.json' );
const tagPattern = /@([^ ~^:?*\\]*?)$/;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function log
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function log() {
const logs = new Map( [
[ 'info', [] ],
[ 'error', [] ]
] );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"