Showing 1,885 of 1,885 total issues
Method Daemon.ProcessEvent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) ProcessEvent(id string, e libcontainerdtypes.EventType, ei libcontainerdtypes.EventInfo) error {
c, err := daemon.GetContainer(id)
if err != nil {
return errors.Wrapf(err, "could not find container %s", id)
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Controller
has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Controller struct {
id string
drvRegistry drvregistry.Networks
ipamRegistry drvregistry.IPAMs
sandboxes map[string]*Sandbox
Method containerRouter.postContainersCreate
has 154 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *containerRouter) postContainersCreate(ctx context.Context, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, vars map[string]string) error {
if err := httputils.ParseForm(r); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := httputils.CheckForJSON(r); err != nil {
File layer_store.go
has 630 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package layer // import "github.com/docker/docker/layer"
import (
"context"
"errors"
Function withMounts
has 152 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func withMounts(daemon *Daemon, daemonCfg *configStore, c *container.Container, ms []container.Mount) coci.SpecOpts {
return func(ctx context.Context, _ coci.Client, _ *containers.Container, s *coci.Spec) (err error) {
sort.Sort(mounts(ms))
mounts := ms
File client.go
has 628 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package remote // import "github.com/docker/docker/libcontainerd/remote"
import (
"context"
"encoding/json"
Endpoint
has 38 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Endpoint struct {
name string
id string
network *Network
iface *EndpointInterface
Method NetworkEntry.Unmarshal
has 150 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *NetworkEntry) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method NetworkEvent.Unmarshal
has 149 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *NetworkEvent) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method puller.pullTag
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *puller) pullTag(ctx context.Context, ref reference.Named, platform *ocispec.Platform) (tagUpdated bool, err error) {
var (
tagOrDigest string // Used for logging/progress only
dgst digest.Digest
mt string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method layerDescriptor.Download
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (ld *layerDescriptor) Download(ctx context.Context, progressOutput progress.Output) (io.ReadCloser, int64, error) {
log.G(ctx).Debugf("pulling blob %q", ld.digest)
var (
err error
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method imageRouter.postImagesCreate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (ir *imageRouter) postImagesCreate(ctx context.Context, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, vars map[string]string) error {
if err := httputils.ParseForm(r); err != nil {
return err
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Daemon.ContainerLogs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) ContainerLogs(ctx context.Context, containerName string, config *containertypes.LogsOptions) (messages <-chan *backend.LogMessage, isTTY bool, retErr error) {
lg := log.G(ctx).WithFields(log.Fields{
"module": "daemon",
"method": "(*Daemon).ContainerLogs",
"container": containerName,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function containerToGRPC
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func containerToGRPC(c *types.ContainerSpec) (*swarmapi.ContainerSpec, error) {
containerSpec := &swarmapi.ContainerSpec{
Image: c.Image,
Labels: c.Labels,
Command: c.Command,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Daemon.findAndAttachNetwork
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) findAndAttachNetwork(ctr *container.Container, idOrName string, epConfig *networktypes.EndpointSettings) (*libnetwork.Network, *networktypes.NetworkingConfig, error) {
id := getNetworkID(idOrName, epConfig)
n, err := daemon.FindNetwork(id)
if err != nil {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method client.createWindows
has 147 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *client) createWindows(id string, spec *specs.Spec, runtimeOptions interface{}) (*container, error) {
logger := c.logger.WithField("container", id)
configuration := &hcsshim.ContainerConfig{
SystemType: "Container",
Name: id,
Method Daemon.ContainerExecStart
has 146 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) ContainerExecStart(ctx context.Context, name string, options backend.ExecStartConfig) (err error) {
var (
cStdin io.ReadCloser
cStdout, cStderr io.Writer
)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (nDB *NetworkDB) dbLeaveNetwork(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
_ = r.ParseForm()
diagnostic.DebugHTTPForm(r)
_, json := diagnostic.ParseHTTPFormOptions(r)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 356.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (nDB *NetworkDB) dbJoinNetwork(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
_ = r.ParseForm()
diagnostic.DebugHTTPForm(r)
_, json := diagnostic.ParseHTTPFormOptions(r)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 356.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method Controller.reservePools
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Controller) reservePools() {
networks, err := c.getNetworks()
if err != nil {
log.G(context.TODO()).Warnf("Could not retrieve networks from local store during ipam allocation for existing networks: %v", err)
return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"