Showing 1,885 of 1,885 total issues
Function setupLabelFilter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func setupLabelFilter(ctx context.Context, store content.Store, fltrs filters.Args) (func(image images.Image) bool, error) {
type labelCheck struct {
key string
value string
onlyExists bool
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function skipPlugin
has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func skipPlugin(dAtA []byte) (n int, err error) {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
depth := 0
for iNdEx < l {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ImageService.ExportImage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (i *ImageService) ExportImage(ctx context.Context, names []string, outStream io.Writer) error {
platform := matchAllWithPreference(platforms.Default())
opts := []archive.ExportOpt{
archive.WithSkipNonDistributableBlobs(),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File cloudwatchlogs.go
has 663 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Package awslogs provides the logdriver for forwarding container logs to Amazon CloudWatch Logs
package awslogs // import "github.com/docker/docker/daemon/logger/awslogs"
import (
"context"
File ndbClient.go
has 662 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package dbclient
import (
"context"
"fmt"
Method Config.CopyStreams
has a Cognitive Complexity of 53 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Config) CopyStreams(ctx context.Context, cfg *AttachConfig) <-chan error {
var group errgroup.Group
// Connect stdin of container to the attach stdin stream.
if cfg.Stdin != nil {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method driver.CreateNetwork
has a Cognitive Complexity of 53 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (d *driver) CreateNetwork(id string, option map[string]interface{}, nInfo driverapi.NetworkInfo, ipV4Data, ipV6Data []driverapi.IPAMData) error {
if _, err := d.getNetwork(id); err == nil {
return types.ForbiddenErrorf("network %s exists", id)
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ImageService.Images
has a Cognitive Complexity of 53 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (i *ImageService) Images(ctx context.Context, opts imagetypes.ListOptions) ([]*imagetypes.Summary, error) {
if err := opts.Filters.Validate(acceptedImageFilterTags); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Controller.NewNetwork
has 166 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Controller) NewNetwork(networkType, name string, id string, options ...NetworkOption) (_ *Network, retErr error) {
if id != "" {
c.networkLocker.Lock(id)
defer c.networkLocker.Unlock(id) //nolint:errcheck
Function New
has 166 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func New(info logger.Info) (logger.Logger, error) {
hostname, err := info.Hostname()
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%s: cannot access hostname to set source field", driverName)
}
Method Daemon.registerMountPoints
has 166 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) registerMountPoints(container *container.Container, hostConfig *containertypes.HostConfig, defaultReadOnlyNonRecursive bool) (retErr error) {
binds := map[string]bool{}
mountPoints := map[string]*volumemounts.MountPoint{}
parser := volumemounts.NewParser()
Method ImageService.setupFilters
has a Cognitive Complexity of 52 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (i *ImageService) setupFilters(ctx context.Context, imageFilters filters.Args) (filterFunc imageFilterFunc, outErr error) {
var fltrs []imageFilterFunc
err := imageFilters.WalkValues("before", func(value string) error {
img, err := i.GetImage(ctx, value, backend.GetImageOpts{})
if err != nil {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function changes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 52 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func changes(layers []string, rw string, dc deleteChange, sc skipChange) ([]Change, error) {
var (
changes []Change
changedDirs = make(map[string]struct{})
)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Plugin.Set
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Plugin) Set(args []string) error {
p.mu.Lock()
defer p.mu.Unlock()
if p.PluginObj.Enabled {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method windowsParser.validateMountConfigReg
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *windowsParser) validateMountConfigReg(mnt *mount.Mount, additionalValidators ...mountValidator) error {
if len(mnt.Target) == 0 {
return &errMountConfig{mnt, errMissingField("Target")}
}
for _, v := range additionalValidators {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Daemon.containerStart
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) containerStart(ctx context.Context, daemonCfg *configStore, container *container.Container, checkpoint string, checkpointDir string, resetRestartManager bool) (retErr error) {
ctx, span := otel.Tracer("").Start(ctx, "daemon.containerStart", trace.WithAttributes(
attribute.String("container.ID", container.ID),
attribute.String("container.Name", container.Name)))
defer span.End()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Info.ExtraAttributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (info *Info) ExtraAttributes(keyMod func(string) string) (map[string]string, error) {
extra := make(map[string]string)
labels, ok := info.Config["labels"]
if ok && len(labels) > 0 {
for _, l := range strings.Split(labels, ",") {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tarSum.Read
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (ts *tarSum) Read(buf []byte) (int, error) {
if ts.finished {
return ts.bufWriter.Read(buf)
}
if len(ts.bufData) < len(buf) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method EndpointRecord.Unmarshal
has 61 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (m *EndpointRecord) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method linuxParser.validateMountConfigImpl
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *linuxParser) validateMountConfigImpl(mnt *mount.Mount, validateBindSourceExists bool) error {
if len(mnt.Target) == 0 {
return &errMountConfig{mnt, errMissingField("Target")}
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"