Showing 254 of 254 total issues
Function store_origin_colors_atomically
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def store_origin_colors_atomically(self):
"""
Store the color of the origin in the mol as the private property _color
:return:
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _gpm_distance
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _gpm_distance(cls, mols: List[Chem.Mol], confs: [Chem.Conformer], i, j, dummy_w_dummy=True) \
-> Tuple[float, float, float]:
"""
See get_positional_distance
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _remove_negatives
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _remove_negatives(self, map: Any) -> Any:
"""
This is a hack to remove negative values from the map.
It like flip_mapping is a tangle of options. The latter has been typing.overload'ed
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _get_novel_other_bonded_pairs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_novel_other_bonded_pairs(self, rings) -> List[Tuple[Chem.Atom, Chem.Atom]]:
pairs = []
for ring in rings:
# ring: Dict[str, List[Any]]
ringcore = ring['atom'] # Chem.Atom
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function error_classify
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def error_classify(cls, text):
if not text:
return cls.error_classifications['SUCCESS']
text = str(text)
for key, value in cls.error_classifications.items():
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_simulation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_simulation(self,
model: Union[mma.PDBFile, mma.Modeller, None] = None,
restraint_k: float = 1_000,
restraining_atom_indices: Sequence[int] = (),
mobile_radius: float = 8.0,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _get_LINK_record
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_LINK_record(self):
if self.is_covalent:
# get correct chain names.
l_resi, l_chain = re.match('(\d+)(\D?)', str(self.ligand_resi)).groups()
if self.covalent_resi:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function binarize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def binarize(mol:Chem.Mol, ignore_errors:bool=True) -> bytes:
"""
Wrapper for ``mol.ToBinary(propertyFlags=0b00010111)``, but with safeguards in case it's not a valid Chem.Mol.
This is convoluted as None is a common error outcome with RDKit
So making it less cryptic
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_polygon
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_polygon(n=6, radius=1.5,
x0=0., y0=0., z0=0.,
star=False, # technical polygram?
bond_type: Chem.BondType = Chem.BondType.SINGLE,
starting_mol: Optional[Chem.Mol] = None,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function preminimized_undummied_mol
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def preminimized_undummied_mol(self) -> Chem.Mol:
"""
This method is called by the plonking into structure methods.
Not "positioning" as intended by ``monster`` is done.
Opening a PDB in RDKit is doable but gets exponentially slow with chain length
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function correct_pdbinfo
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def correct_pdbinfo(mol: Chem.Mol, resn: str, resi: int, chain: str):
"""
In Igor, RDKit to Params fixes it.
In RDKit MolToPDBBlock https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/blob/32655f5365e363ce13bd6b28e2e9e2544f8680bd/Code/GraphMol/FileParsers/PDBWriter.cpp#L66
it is hidden.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mmff_minimize
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mmff_minimize(self,
Function place
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def place(self, smiles: str, number_runs: int= 10,
Function __call__
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __call__(self,
Function replace_hits
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def replace_hits(cls,
Function combine
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def combine(self,
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if neigh not in morituri:
mol.AddBond(center_i, neigh, bt)
new_bond = mol.GetBondBetweenAtoms(center_i, neigh)
BondProvenance.set_bond(new_bond, 'original')
else:
Function _merge_part
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _merge_part(self, scaffold: Chem.Mol, fragmentanda: Chem.Mol, anchor_index: int,
Function _prevent_two_bonds_on_dummy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _prevent_two_bonds_on_dummy(self, mol: Chem.RWMol):
"""
The case '*(C)C' is seen legitimately in some warheads... but in most cases these are not.
:param mol:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __call__
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __call__(self, # noqa signature matches... it is just Boost being Boost