Showing 214 of 214 total issues
Function applyPlacement
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Tooltip.prototype.applyPlacement = function (offset, placement) {
var replace
var $tip = this.tip()
var width = $tip[0].offsetWidth
var height = $tip[0].offsetHeight
Method setup_components
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setup_components
self.destination_root = options[:root]
if in_app_root?
@_components = options.class.new options.select{ |key,_| self.class.component_types.include?(key.to_sym) }
@app_name = (options[:app] || "App").gsub(/\W/, '_').camelize
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$.support.transition && this.$tip.hasClass('fade') ?
$tip
.one($.support.transition.end, complete)
.emulateTransitionEnd(150) :
complete()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$.support.transition && this.$tip.hasClass('fade') ?
$tip
.one($.support.transition.end, complete)
.emulateTransitionEnd(150) :
complete()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method setup_orm
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setup_orm
ar = MR
db = @project_name.underscore
begin
Method params_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def params_for(pattern, others)
data = match(pattern)
params = indifferent_hash
if data.names.empty?
params.merge!(:captures => data.captures) unless data.captures.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tag_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tag_attributes(options)
return '' unless options
options.inject('') do |all,(key,value)|
next all unless value
all << ' ' if all.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method object_sources
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def object_sources(target)
sources = Set.new
target.methods.each do |method_name|
next unless method_name.kind_of?(Symbol)
method_object = target.method(method_name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method named_routes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def named_routes
return [] unless app_obj.respond_to?(:routes)
app_obj.routes.map { |route|
request_method = route.request_methods.first
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method setup_orm
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setup_orm
sequel = SEQUEL
db = @project_name.underscore
require_dependencies 'sequel'
Method setup_orm
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setup_orm
ar = AR
db = @project_name.underscore
begin
Method create_app
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_app
self.destination_root = options[:root]
underscore_name = name.gsub(/\W/, '_')
@app_folder = underscore_name.underscore
@app_name = underscore_name.camelize
Method setup_project
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setup_project
valid_constant? name
app = (options[:app] || "App")
@project_name = name.gsub(/\W/, '_').underscore.camelize
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def create_model_file(name, options={})
model_path = destination_root(options[:app], 'models', "#{name.to_s.underscore}.rb")
field_tuples = options[:fields].map { |value| value.split(":") }
column_declarations = field_tuples.map { |field, kind| "property :#{field}, #{kind.underscore.camelize}" }.join("\n ")
model_contents = RIPPLE_MODEL.gsub(/!NAME!/, name.to_s.underscore.camelize)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def create_model_file(name, options={})
model_path = destination_root(options[:app], 'models', "#{name.to_s.underscore}.rb")
field_tuples = options[:fields].map { |value| value.split(":") }
column_declarations = field_tuples.map { |field, kind| "field :#{field}, :type => #{kind.underscore.camelize}" }.join("\n ")
model_contents = MONGOID_MODEL.gsub(/!NAME!/, name.to_s.underscore.camelize)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def create_model_file(name, options={})
model_path = destination_root(options[:app], 'models', "#{name.to_s.underscore}.rb")
field_tuples = options[:fields].map { |value| value.split(":") }
column_declarations = field_tuples.map { |field, kind| "key :#{field}, #{kind.underscore.camelize}" }.join("\n ")
model_contents = MM_MODEL.gsub(/!NAME!/, name.to_s.underscore.camelize)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method number_to_human_size
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def number_to_human_size(number, *args)
return nil if number.nil?
options = args.last.is_a?(Hash) ? Utils.symbolize_keys(args.pop) : {}
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(options={})
@buffer = []
@auto_flush = options.has_key?(:auto_flush) ? options[:auto_flush] : true
@level = options[:log_level] ? Padrino::Logger::Levels[options[:log_level]] : Padrino::Logger::Levels[:debug]
@log = options[:stream] || $stdout
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method construct_filter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def construct_filter(*args, &block)
options = args.last.is_a?(Hash) ? args.pop : {}
if except = options.delete(:except)
fail "You cannot use :except with other options specified" unless args.empty? && options.empty?
except = Array(except)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method cache
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cache(key, opts = {}, &block)
if settings.caching?
began_at = Time.now
if settings.cache.key?(key.to_s)
value = settings.cache[key.to_s]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"