Showing 22,177 of 22,177 total issues
Method prepend_migrate
has 201 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def prepend_migrate(buf)
payloadsize = "0x%04x" % buf.length
procname = datastore['PrependMigrateProc'] || 'rundll32'
# Prepare instructions to get address of block_api into ebp
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
des_odd_parity = [
1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 4, 7, 7, 8, 8, 11, 11, 13, 13, 14, 14,
16, 16, 19, 19, 21, 21, 22, 22, 25, 25, 26, 26, 28, 28, 31, 31,
32, 32, 35, 35, 37, 37, 38, 38, 41, 41, 42, 42, 44, 44, 47, 47,
49, 49, 50, 50, 52, 52, 55, 55, 56, 56, 59, 59, 61, 61, 62, 62,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 258.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
crc32_reverse = [
0x00000000, 0xDB710641, 0x6D930AC3, 0xB6E20C82,
0xDB261586, 0x005713C7, 0xB6B51F45, 0x6DC41904,
0x6D3D2D4D, 0xB64C2B0C, 0x00AE278E, 0xDBDF21CF,
0xB61B38CB, 0x6D6A3E8A, 0xDB883208, 0x00F93449,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 258.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
bwd_table = [
0x00000000, 0xDB710641, 0x6D930AC3, 0xB6E20C82,
0xDB261586, 0x005713C7, 0xB6B51F45, 0x6DC41904,
0x6D3D2D4D, 0xB64C2B0C, 0x00AE278E, 0xDBDF21CF,
0xB61B38CB, 0x6D6A3E8A, 0xDB883208, 0x00F93449,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 258.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
LOOKUP_ALAW2LIN16 = [
-5504, -5248, -6016, -5760, -4480, -4224, -4992,
-4736, -7552, -7296, -8064, -7808, -6528, -6272,
-7040, -6784, -2752, -2624, -3008, -2880, -2240,
-2112, -2496, -2368, -3776, -3648, -4032, -3904,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 258.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
LOOKUP_ULAW2LIN16 = [
-32124, -31100, -30076, -29052, -28028, -27004, -25980,
-24956, -23932, -22908, -21884, -20860, -19836, -18812,
-17788, -16764, -15996, -15484, -14972, -14460, -13948,
-13436, -12924, -12412, -11900, -11388, -10876, -10364,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 258.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method run_host
has 200 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run_host(ip)
timeout = datastore['TIMEOUT'].to_i
instances = datastore['INSTANCES']
Method build_t3_request_object
has 200 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_t3_request_object
# T3 request serialized data
# retrieved by watching network traffic
# This is a proprietary, undocumented protocol
File encrypted_reverse_tcp.rb
has 500 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'rex/peparsey'
require 'metasploit/framework/compiler/mingw'
module Msf
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'MS07-029 Microsoft DNS RPC Service extractQuotedChar() Overflow (SMB)',
'Description' => %q{
This module exploits a stack buffer overflow in the RPC interface
of the Microsoft DNS service. The vulnerability is triggered
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 257.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'MS07-029 Microsoft DNS RPC Service extractQuotedChar() Overflow (TCP)',
'Description' => %q{
This module exploits a stack buffer overflow in the RPC interface
of the Microsoft DNS service. The vulnerability is triggered
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 257.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File http_form_field.rb
has 499 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Auxiliary
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient
def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
Method enum_instance
has 199 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def enum_instance(rhost)
print_status("#{rhost}:#{rport} [SAP] Connecting to SAP Management Console SOAP Interface")
success = false
soapenv='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/'
xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'
Method build_t3_request_object
has 199 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_t3_request_object
# T3 request serialized data
# retrieved by watching network traffic
# This is a proprietary, undocumented protocol
data = '000005c3' # lenght of the packet
File creds.rb
has 497 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'rexml/document'
require 'metasploit/framework/password_crackers/hashcat/formatter'
require 'metasploit/framework/password_crackers/jtr/formatter'
module Msf
Method cmd_nexpose_scan
has 198 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cmd_nexpose_scan(*args)
opts = Rex::Parser::Arguments.new(
'-h' => [ false, 'This help menu'],
'-t' => [ true, 'The scan template to use (default:pentest-audit options:full-audit,exhaustive-audit,discovery,aggressive-discovery,dos-audit)'],
'-c' => [ true, 'Specify credentials to use against these targets (format is type:user:pass'],
Method enumerate_writable_path_dirs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def enumerate_writable_path_dirs(path_dirs, user_groups, current_user)
writable_path_dirs = []
perms_we_need = ['(F)', '(M)']
print_status('')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_crypto_keys
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_crypto_keys(log_folder)
# Run commands according to the session type
if session.type =~ /shell/
# Enumerate and retreave files according to privilege level
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
# check for meterpreter and version of ie
if (session.type != 'meterpreter') && session.platform !~ (/win/)
print_error('This module only works with Windows Meterpreter sessions')
return 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method send_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def send_data(host,port)
self.status = {:write_allowed => true}
data_blocks = blockify_file_or_data()
if data_blocks.empty?
yield "Closing down since there is no data to send." if block_given?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"