Showing 1,820 of 1,820 total issues
Method Reconciler.ReconcileService
has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *Reconciler) ReconcileService(id string) error {
var (
service *api.Service
tasks []*api.Task
cluster *api.Cluster
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Dispatcher.Tasks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (d *Dispatcher) Tasks(r *api.TasksRequest, stream api.Dispatcher_TasksServer) error {
d.rpcRW.RLock()
defer d.rpcRW.RUnlock()
dctx, err := d.isRunningLocked()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Meta.Unmarshal
has 152 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *Meta) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method IssueNodeCertificateRequest.Unmarshal
has 151 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *IssueNodeCertificateRequest) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method Endpoint.Unmarshal
has 151 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *Endpoint) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method ConfigSpec.Unmarshal
has 150 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *ConfigSpec) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method ContainerSpec.Size
has 150 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *ContainerSpec) Size() (n int) {
if m == nil {
return 0
}
var l int
Method Updater.Run
has 149 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (u *Updater) Run(ctx context.Context, slots []orchestrator.Slot) {
defer close(u.doneChan)
service := u.newService
Method Dispatcher.Assignments
has 148 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (d *Dispatcher) Assignments(r *api.AssignmentsRequest, stream api.Dispatcher_AssignmentsServer) error {
d.rpcRW.RLock()
defer d.rpcRW.RUnlock()
dctx, err := d.isRunningLocked()
Method Orchestrator.reconcileServices
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *Orchestrator) reconcileServices(ctx context.Context, serviceIDs []string) {
nodeTasks := make(map[string]map[string][]*api.Task)
g.store.View(func(tx store.ReadTx) {
for _, serviceID := range serviceIDs {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Config.Unmarshal
has 145 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *Config) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method StoreSnapshot.MarshalToSizedBuffer
has 145 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *StoreSnapshot) MarshalToSizedBuffer(dAtA []byte) (int, error) {
i := len(dAtA)
_ = i
var l int
_ = l
Method HealthCheckResponse.Unmarshal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *HealthCheckResponse) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ResolveAddressRequest.Unmarshal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *ResolveAddressRequest) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ReplicatedService.Unmarshal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *ReplicatedService) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method LogSelector.Unmarshal
has 143 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *LogSelector) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method LogContext.Unmarshal
has 143 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *LogContext) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method ContainerSpec_DNSConfig.Unmarshal
has 143 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *ContainerSpec_DNSConfig) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method SelectByCustom.Unmarshal
has 143 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *SelectByCustom) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Similar blocks of code found in 14 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *raftProxyNodeCAServer) IssueNodeCertificate(ctx context.Context, r *IssueNodeCertificateRequest) (*IssueNodeCertificateResponse, error) {
conn, err := p.connSelector.LeaderConn(ctx)
if err != nil {
if err == raftselector.ErrIsLeader {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 352.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76