Showing 18 of 18 total issues
Function SlackCommandFunc
has 127 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func SlackCommandFunc(ctx context.Context, input sarah.Input, config sarah.CommandConfig) (*sarah.CommandResponse, error) {
strippedMessage := sarah.StripMessage(MatchPattern, input.Message())
// Share the client instance with later executions
conf, _ := config.(*CommandConfig)
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
err := func() error {
locker.Lock()
defer locker.Unlock()
rv := reflect.ValueOf(cfg)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 209.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
err := func() error {
locker.Lock()
defer locker.Unlock()
rv := reflect.ValueOf(cfg)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 209.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function buildScheduledTask
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func buildScheduledTask(ctx context.Context, props *ScheduledTaskProps, watcher ConfigWatcher) (ScheduledTask, error) {
if props.config == nil {
// If a config struct is not set, props MUST provide a default schedule to execute the task.
if props.schedule == "" {
return nil, ErrTaskScheduleNotGiven
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var SlackProps = sarah.NewScheduledTaskPropsBuilder().
BotType(slack.SLACK).
Identifier("timer").
ConfigurableFunc(&timerConfig{}, func(_ context.Context, config sarah.TaskConfig) ([]*sarah.ScheduledTaskResult, error) {
return []*sarah.ScheduledTaskResult{
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 127.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var SlackProps = sarah.NewScheduledTaskPropsBuilder().
BotType(slack.SLACK).
Identifier("fixed_timer").
ConfigurableFunc(&timerConfig{}, func(_ context.Context, config sarah.TaskConfig) ([]*sarah.ScheduledTaskResult, error) {
return []*sarah.ScheduledTaskResult{
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 127.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function buildScheduledTask
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func buildScheduledTask(ctx context.Context, props *ScheduledTaskProps, watcher ConfigWatcher) (ScheduledTask, error) {
if props.config == nil {
// If a config struct is not set, props MUST provide a default schedule to execute the task.
if props.schedule == "" {
return nil, ErrTaskScheduleNotGiven
Method command.inputTime
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (cmd *command) inputTime(_ context.Context, input sarah.Input, validDate string, args *args) (*sarah.CommandResponse, error) {
t := strings.TrimSpace(input.Message())
reinput := func(c context.Context, i sarah.Input) (*sarah.CommandResponse, error) {
return cmd.inputTime(c, i, validDate, args)
Method Client.Get
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (client *Client) Get(ctx context.Context, apiType string, queryParams *url.Values, data interface{}) error {
endpoint := client.buildEndpoint(apiType, queryParams)
req, err := http.NewRequest(http.MethodGet, endpoint.String(), nil)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to build request: %w", err)
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if config.HelpCommand != "" && trimmed == config.HelpCommand {
// Help command
help := sarah.NewHelpInput(input)
_ = enqueueInput(help)
} else if config.AbortCommand != "" && trimmed == config.AbortCommand {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 109.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if config.HelpCommand != "" && trimmed == config.HelpCommand {
// Help command
help := sarah.NewHelpInput(input)
_ = enqueueInput(help)
} else if config.AbortCommand != "" && trimmed == config.AbortCommand {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 109.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func RegisterScheduledTaskProps(props *ScheduledTaskProps) {
options.register(func(r *runner) {
stashed, ok := r.scheduledTaskProps[props.botType]
if !ok {
stashed = []*ScheduledTaskProps{}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func RegisterCommandProps(props *CommandProps) {
options.register(func(r *runner) {
stashed, ok := r.commandProps[props.botType]
if !ok {
stashed = []*CommandProps{}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method RestAPIClient.Post
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (client *RestAPIClient) Post(ctx context.Context, resourceFragments []string, sendingPayload interface{}, responsePayload interface{}) error {
reqBody, err := json.Marshal(sendingPayload)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("can not marshal given payload: %w", err)
}
Function guessFunc
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func guessFunc(_ context.Context, input sarah.Input, answer int) (*sarah.CommandResponse, error) {
// For handiness, create a function that recursively calls guessFunc until the user inputs the right answer.
retry := func(c context.Context, i sarah.Input) (*sarah.CommandResponse, error) {
return guessFunc(c, i, answer)
}
Method command.inputDate
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (cmd *command) inputDate(_ context.Context, input sarah.Input, args *args) (*sarah.CommandResponse, error) {
date := strings.TrimSpace(input.Message())
reinput := func(c context.Context, i sarah.Input) (*sarah.CommandResponse, error) {
return cmd.inputDate(c, i, args)
Function buildCommand
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func buildCommand(ctx context.Context, props *CommandProps, watcher ConfigWatcher) (Command, error) {
if props.config == nil {
return &defaultCommand{
identifier: props.identifier,
matchFunc: props.matchFunc,
Method runner.superviseBot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *runner) superviseBot(runnerCtx context.Context, botType BotType) (context.Context, func(error)) {
botCtx, cancel := context.WithCancel(runnerCtx)
sendAlert := func(err error) {
e := r.alerters.alertAll(runnerCtx, botType, err)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"