Showing 107 of 112 total issues
Function signClaim
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func signClaim(rawTx *wire.MsgTx, privKey btcec.PrivateKey, claim, channel *c.StakeHelper, channelClaimID string) error {
claimIDHexBytes, err := hex.DecodeString(channelClaimID)
if err != nil {
return errors.Err(err)
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function certifyClaim
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func certifyClaim(claimToBeSynced claimToBeSynced) (bool, error) {
signedHelper, err := c.DecodeClaimHex(claimToBeSynced.SignedClaimHex, global.BlockChainName)
if err != nil {
return false, errors.Err(errors.Prefix(certificateSyncPrefix, err))
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function getChainSyncJobStatus
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func getChainSyncJobStatus() (*model.JobStatus, error) {
jobStatus, err := model.FindJobStatusG(chainSyncJob)
if errors.Is(sql.ErrNoRows, err) {
syncState := chainSyncStatus{LastHeight: 0}
bytes, err := json.Marshal(syncState)
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function processAsClaim
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func processAsClaim(script []byte, vout model.Output, tx model.Transaction, blockHeight uint64) (address *string, claimID *string, err error) {
defer metrics.Processing(time.Now(), "claim")
var pubkeyscript []byte
var name string
var claimid string
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if c.Vin.ScriptSigAsm.String != v.ScriptSig.Asm {
c.Vin.ScriptSigAsm.String = v.ScriptSig.Asm
c.Vin.ScriptSigAsm.Valid = v.ScriptSig.Asm != ""
colsToUpdate = append(colsToUpdate, model.InputColumns.ScriptSigAsm)
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 102.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if c.Vin.ScriptSigHex.String != v.ScriptSig.Hex {
c.Vin.ScriptSigHex.String = v.ScriptSig.Hex
c.Vin.ScriptSigHex.Valid = v.ScriptSig.Hex != ""
colsToUpdate = append(colsToUpdate, model.InputColumns.ScriptSigHex)
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 102.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Your code does not pass gofmt in 5 places. Go fmt your code! Open
package lbrycrd
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Function ProcessVout
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func ProcessVout(jsonVout *lbrycrd.Vout, tx *m.Transaction, txDC *txDebitCredits, blockHeight uint64) error {
defer metrics.Processing(time.Now(), "vout")
vout := &m.Output{}
foundVout := ds.GetOutput(tx.Hash, uint(jsonVout.N))
if foundVout != nil {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function CertificateSync
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func CertificateSync() {
if !certificateSyncRunning {
metrics.JobLoad.WithLabelValues("certificate_sync").Inc()
defer metrics.JobLoad.WithLabelValues("certificate_sync").Dec()
defer metrics.Job(time.Now(), "certificate_sync")
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function SyncClaimCntInChannel
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func SyncClaimCntInChannel() error {
latestBlock, err := model.Blocks(qm.Select(model.BlockColumns.Height), qm.OrderBy(model.BlockColumns.Height+" DESC")).OneG()
if err != nil {
return errors.Prefix(syncClaimsInChannel, err)
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Your code does not pass gofmt in 4 places. Go fmt your code! Open
package jobs
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 3 places. Go fmt your code! Open
package apiactions
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 3 places. Go fmt your code! Open
package processing
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 2 places. Go fmt your code! Open
package lbrycrd
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 2 places. Go fmt your code! Open
package datastore
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 2 places. Go fmt your code! Open
package lbrycrd
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 2 places. Go fmt your code! Open
package daemon
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 2 places. Go fmt your code! Open
package twilio
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 1 place. Go fmt your code! Open
package jobs
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 1 place. Go fmt your code! Open
package apiactions
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks