SUSE/saptune

View on GitHub

Showing 96 of 96 total issues

Function GetBlkVal has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
Open

func GetBlkVal(key string, cur *param.BlockDeviceQueue) (string, string, error) {
    retVal := ""
    info := ""

    switch {
Severity: Major
Found in sap/note/sectBlock.go - About 35 mins to fix

    Method App.RevertSolution has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
    Open

    func (app *App) RevertSolution(solName string) error {
        sol, err := app.GetSolutionByName(solName)
        if err != nil {
            return err
        }
    Severity: Major
    Found in app/app.go - About 35 mins to fix

      Function SecureBootEnabled has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
      Open

      func SecureBootEnabled() bool {
          var isSecBootFileName = regexp.MustCompile(`^SecureBoot-\w[\w-]+`)
          if _, err := os.Stat(efiVarsDir); os.IsNotExist(err) {
              InfoLog("no EFI directory '%+s' found, assuming legacy boot", efiVarsDir)
              return false
      Severity: Major
      Found in system/cpu.go - About 35 mins to fix

        Function SetBlkVal has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
        Open

        func SetBlkVal(key, value string, cur *param.BlockDeviceQueue, revert bool) error {
            var err error
        
            switch {
            case system.IsSched.MatchString(key):
        Severity: Major
        Found in sap/note/sectBlock.go - About 35 mins to fix

          Method App.RevertNote has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
          Open

          func (app *App) RevertNote(noteID string, permanent bool) error {
          
              noteTemplate, err := app.GetNoteByID(noteID)
              if err != nil {
                  // to revert an applied note even if the corresponding
          Severity: Major
          Found in app/app.go - About 35 mins to fix

            Method App.TuneSolution has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
            Open

            func (app *App) TuneSolution(solName string) (removedExplicitNotes []string, err error) {
                removedExplicitNotes = make([]string, 0)
                sol, err := app.GetSolutionByName(solName)
                if err != nil {
                    return
            Severity: Major
            Found in app/app.go - About 35 mins to fix

              Method App.VerifyNote has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
              Open

              func (app *App) VerifyNote(noteID string) (conforming bool, comparisons map[string]note.FieldComparison, valApplyList []string, err error) {
                  theNote, err := app.GetNoteByID(noteID)
                  if err != nil {
                      return
                  }
              Severity: Major
              Found in app/app.go - About 35 mins to fix

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                func GetSysString(parameter string) (string, error) {
                    val, err := ioutil.ReadFile(path.Join("/sys", strings.Replace(parameter, ".", "/", -1)))
                    if err != nil {
                        WarningLog("failed to read sys string key '%s': %v", parameter, err)
                        return "PNA", err
                Severity: Minor
                Found in system/sys.go and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
                system/sysctl.go on lines 184..191

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 104.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                func GetSysctlString(parameter string) (string, error) {
                    val, err := ioutil.ReadFile(path.Join("/proc/sys", strings.Replace(parameter, ".", "/", -1)))
                    if err != nil {
                        WarningLog("Failed to read sysctl key '%s': %v", parameter, err)
                        return "PNA", err
                Severity: Minor
                Found in system/sysctl.go and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
                system/sys.go on lines 15..22

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 104.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    case system.IsNrreq.MatchString(key):
                        if revert {
                            ival, _ := strconv.Atoi(value)
                            cur.BlockDeviceNrRequests.NrRequests[strings.TrimPrefix(key, "NRREQ_")] = ival
                        }
                Severity: Minor
                Found in sap/note/sectBlock.go and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
                sap/note/sectBlock.go on lines 137..145

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 101.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    case system.IsRahead.MatchString(key):
                        if revert {
                            ival, _ := strconv.Atoi(value)
                            cur.BlockDeviceReadAheadKB.ReadAheadKB[strings.TrimPrefix(key, "READ_AHEAD_KB_")] = ival
                        }
                Severity: Minor
                Found in sap/note/sectBlock.go and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
                sap/note/sectBlock.go on lines 128..136

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 101.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Function GetSolutionDefintion has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                func GetSolutionDefintion(solsDir, extraDir, noteDir string) map[string]map[string]Solution {
                    sols := make(map[string]map[string]Solution)
                    sol := make(map[string]Solution)
                    currentArch := ""
                    arch := ""
                Severity: Minor
                Found in sap/solution/solution.go - About 25 mins to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Function main has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                def main():
                
                    # Check if FORCE is set.
                    try:
                        if os.environ['FORCE'] != '1':
                Severity: Minor
                Found in ospackage/usr/share/saptune/schemas/1.0/templates/build.py - About 25 mins to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Method INISettings.Optimise has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                func (vend INISettings) Optimise() (Note, error) {
                    blckOK := make(map[string][]string)
                    scheds := ""
                    next := false
                
                
                Severity: Minor
                Found in sap/note/ini.go - About 25 mins to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Function getInfoTxt has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                func getInfoTxt(action string, state bool) (string, string, bool, bool) {
                    sinfo := ""
                
                    active, err := system.SystemctlIsRunning(SaptuneService)
                    if err != nil {
                Severity: Minor
                Found in actions/serviceacts.go - About 25 mins to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Function chkBlkTags has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                func chkBlkTags(info, tagField string, secFields, actbdev []string) (bool, []string) {
                    ret := false
                    info = strings.TrimPrefix(info, "blk")
                    tagExpr := fmt.Sprintf(".*%s.*", tagField)
                    // vendor or model
                Severity: Minor
                Found in txtparser/tags.go - About 25 mins to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Severity
                Category
                Status
                Source
                Language